tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Apr 22 05:39:06 2004

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: DaHjaj {pab qay'wI'mey} DaqDaq chu'wI' tu'lu'

Scott Willis ([email protected])

• From: "Scott Willis" <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: DaHjaj {pab qay'wI'mey} DaqDaq chu'wI' tu'lu'
• Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 08:38:13 -0400
• References: <[email protected]>

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "QeS lagh" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2004 10:10 PM
Subject: DaHjaj {pab qay'wI'mey} DaqDaq chu'wI' tu'lu'

> QeS lagh:
> 'ach De' vIlughmoHchu'meH, Satlhob: {SuDbogh qach tIn} jIjatlhlaH'a', pagh
> {SuDbogh qach 'ej tInbogh} vIjatlhnIS'a'?

HIja' }}: )

pabchu' Hoch mu'tlheghmeylIj. DIp choHlaH wotmeyvam, 'ach DIp choH wot 'e'
raD pagh.
'ej wotmey bIHbej.

Both of your sentences are fine. These verbs *can* act adjectivially, but
they don't *have* to. And they're still verbs, anyway you cut it.

--ngabwI'
Beginners' Grammarian,
Klingon Language Institute
http://kli.org/
HovpoH 701446.2

• References:
  • DaHjaj {pab qay'wI'mey} DaqDaq chu'wI' tu'lu'
    • From: "QeS lagh" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Headless relatives and {SuDbogh Dargh 'ej wovbogh}
• Next by Date: Re: Probability
• Previous by thread: DaHjaj {pab qay'wI'mey} DaqDaq chu'wI' tu'lu'
• Next by thread: Headless relatives and {SuDbogh Dargh 'ej wovbogh}
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level