tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sat Sep 13 08:46:15 2003

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: KLBC love

Lieven (Quvar valer) ([email protected])

• From: Lieven (Quvar valer) <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: KLBC love
• Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 15:43:28 +0200
• In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

Am 13.09.2003 14:08:07, schrieb "Agnieszka Solska" <[email protected]>:

>lab Quvar:
>
>>{bang} is not the idea of "love" in general, it means "loved one", and this 
>>includes all persons you love, parents or neighbors.
>
>bIna''a', Quvaroy {{;-) ?

ghobe'. I believe that I already explained it in an other message: I somehow mixed up the chapters. 
But now after being pointed at, I see the difference.

>That's what I assumed, too, until a few months ago a friend of mine pointed 
>out that my assumption might be wrong.

Anyway, a very interesting explanation.

>I agree that it is very tempting to assume that the relatively new word 
>{parmaqqay} ? I think we only got it because of that episode of DS9 - can 
>refer only to your "significant othey" while the old word {bang} is broader 

Maybe we should take it literally?
   {yIqIm, bangwI' -- tugh chegh parmaqqaywI'!}  ;-)

Quvar.

• References:
  • Re: KLBC love
    • From: "Agnieszka Solska" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Sa'Hut
• Next by Date: ftp site
• Prev by thread: Re: KLBC love
• Next by thread: Klingon WOTD: tetlh (n)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level