tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Oct 20 12:26:23 2003

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

RE: {-be'} and {be'}

...Paul ([email protected])

• From: "...Paul" <[email protected]>
• Subject: RE: {-be'} and {be'}
• Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 10:27:45 -0700 (PDT)
• In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]>

On Mon, 20 Oct 2003, Lawrence Schoen wrote:
> The association she's making is the wrong one. Not that women are
> negative, but rather that women have the power of negation. Or more
> simply, they're the ones who get to say "no."

This made me think of another idea, which is that the female is the
opposite of male, and the suffix effectively provides an opposite of the
norm.  Not that either is any lesser; they mirror the concept of yin and
yang.

...Paul

 **        Have a question that reality just can't answer?        **
  ** Visit Project Galactic Guide http://www.galactic-guide.com/ **
              "No matter where you go, there you are."

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: {-be'} and {be'}
    • From: "Scott Willis" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: (KLBC) Is this right?
• Next by Date: Re: Daddy Daycare
• Prev by thread: RE: {-be'} and {be'}
• Next by thread: Re: {-be'} and {be'}
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level