tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Jun 10 22:44:53 2003

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: jaghla? x jagh la'

• From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: jaghla? x jagh la'
• Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 22:38:42 -0500
• In-Reply-To: <B8ZV714W96G91ZIHKGPJ6MJDB71E9.3ed5c0f3@quvar>
• References: <B8ZV714W96G91ZIHKGPJ6MJDB71E9.3ed5c0f3@quvar>

ja'pu' QaroH:
>
>The jaghla? ? could this be in fact   jagh la? ?
>Or is it a canon because it was in TKD like this?
>Which one is correct?

ja' Quvar:
>
>Third answer:
>Maybe MO did a typo? {jaghla'} is not in the wordlist.

Neither is {tIjwI'ghom}.  I think {jaghla'} is one of those things that's
been put together "in the manner of a compound noun" even though it's not
in the dictionary. :-)

-- ghunchu'wI'

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: jaghla? x jagh la'
    • From: Quvar valer (Lieven) <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Hallmark BoP commercial
• Next by Date: RE: lugh'a' mughghachvam?
• Prev by thread: Re: Hallmark BoP commercial
• Next by thread: Re: jaghla? x jagh la'
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level