tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Jul 13 14:37:05 2003

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

RE: Sleep is for the Weak

• From: Klingon Warrior <[email protected]>
• Subject: RE: Sleep is for the Weak
• Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2003 12:32:26 -0700 (PDT)
• In-Reply-To: <001001c34954$e14a76a0$6401a8c0@BotanyBay>

Thanks, SuStel!

David Trimboli <[email protected]> wrote:> -----Original Message-----
> buy' ngop! yInwIj chaH tlhIngan Hol, DawI', *theatre* je. 
> (<= now where does the suffix /'e'/ go on this sentence???) 

yInwIj chaH tlhIngan Hol'e', DawI''e', *theatre*'e' je.

Put it on each one. This is supposition; Okrand has never had nouns and
a conjunction on one side of a "to be"-acting pronoun.

I've never been thrilled about the use of /DawI'/ as "actor," though.
The meaning intersects with "actor" a little, but it doesn't equate with
that word.

SuStel
Stardate 3530.9


Klingon Warrior
taHjaj wo'!
Darren M. Slade





---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!

• References:
  • RE: Sleep is for the Weak
    • From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Is the language too bound for its own good? (was Re: Klingon - Terminology Databases (IMHO))
• Next by Date: Re: Is the language too bound for its own good? (was Re: Klingon - Terminology Databases (IMHO))
• Prev by thread: RE: Sleep is for the Weak
• Next by thread: RE: Sleep is for the Weak
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level