tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Apr 03 22:29:09 2003

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

RE: Tao Te Ching Chp. 22

• From: "DloraH" <[email protected]>
• Subject: RE: Tao Te Ching Chp. 22
• Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2003 22:24:17 -0500
• Importance: Normal
• In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

> bIQopchugh vaj bIchu'qa' [C].
>
> [C]: Sadly, a {–choH}-ed verb was out of the question as it would
> change the meaning.

I agree that it needs -qa'.  Too bad -qa' and -choH are both type 3.

DloraH

• References:
  • Tao Te Ching Chp. 22
    • From: "Agnieszka Solska" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Fwd: APRIL FOOL PRANK
• Next by Date: Klingon WOTD: yaD (n)
• Prev by thread: Tao Te Ching Chp. 22
• Next by thread: Tao Te Ching Chp. 24
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level