tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Sep 19 15:28:50 2002
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: lugh
- From: ruehli@arcor.de
- Subject: Re: lugh
- Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 22:27:31 +0200 (CEST)
jatlh Sanqar
> As I reread this, it sounds presumptuous, someone who has taken a single
> course in German lecturing a native speaker, but as those concepts were
no problem.
> explained in my course, and according to modern American English usage of
> subjective and objective, the dichotomy you set up doesn't hold. Even in
> the examples Quvar gave, both the 'ist richtig' and the 'hat recht' versions
> are objectively true.
>
I was oversimplifying, I guess.
> Maybe we're both saying the same thing in a different way.
>
anyway, I agree that {lugh} seems to be appropriate for expressing
both meanings.
> qamaw 'e' vIHechbe'. "German" Hol laH'e', SoH po' law', jIH po' puS net
> Sovba'. chaq qayajchu'be'.
>
chomawbe'.
Marc Ruehlaender
aka HomDoq
ruehli@arcor.de-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Kaufen Sie sich Ihren Kandidaten! Nur 49 Cent!
Vom 20. bis 22. September:
http://www.arcor.de/home/redir.php/email.kandidat
-----------------------------------------------------------------------