tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Sep 19 15:28:50 2002

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: lugh




jatlh Sanqar
> As I reread this, it sounds presumptuous, someone who has taken a single 
> course in German lecturing a native speaker, but as those concepts were 

no problem.

> explained in my course, and according to modern American English usage of 
> subjective and objective, the dichotomy you set up doesn't hold.  Even in 
> the examples Quvar gave, both the 'ist richtig' and the 'hat recht' versions
> are objectively true.
> 
I was oversimplifying, I guess.

> Maybe we're both saying the same thing in a different way.
> 
anyway, I agree that {lugh} seems to be appropriate for expressing
both meanings.

> qamaw 'e' vIHechbe'.  "German" Hol laH'e', SoH po' law', jIH po' puS net 
> Sovba'. chaq qayajchu'be'.
> 
chomawbe'.

Marc Ruehlaender
aka HomDoq
ruehli@arcor.de-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Kaufen Sie sich Ihren Kandidaten! Nur 49 Cent!
Vom 20. bis 22. September:
http://www.arcor.de/home/redir.php/email.kandidat
-----------------------------------------------------------------------



Back to archive top level