tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sat Sep 14 05:47:57 2002

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: nuH

• From: Stephan Schneider <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: nuH
• Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 19:06:25 +0200
• In-Reply-To: <PNZ5B7ICKGC8E9EBWQB9C7617365C9.3d80aa96@pc>
• References: <PNZ5B7ICKGC8E9EBWQB9C7617365C9.3d80aa96@pc>

>Am 12.09.2002 09:09:02, schrieb [email protected]:
>
>>So in the sentence you questioned, nuH is plural, but just isn't 
>>marked as such.
>
>Damn. I answered that mail, and then received yours. :-)
>but we said the same thing.
>
>Quvar.

thank you anyway, Quvar. :)
tulwI',
sts.

• References:
  • Re: nuH
    • From: Quvar valer <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: nuH
• Next by Date: direct / indirect object
• Prev by thread: Re: nuH
• Next by thread: Re: nuH
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level