tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Sep 11 17:18:51 2002
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: wanI' tlhaQ wa'
Am 11.09.2002 16:59:05, schrieb [email protected]:
>> >For the newbies that might be watching, /jang/ is not a verb of speech, you
>> >would still need to use /jatlh/.
>> >jang loD, jatlh <chaq...>
>>
>> jang 'avwI': jI''oj je (?)
>
>He wrote that before he re-thought the verbs of speech.
Really? That makes it more complicated, when we have to remember what of canon is not correct.
Well, we could then understand it as
jang 'avwI'.
<<jI'oj je>>
Where does he explain the correct use of {jang}?
AFAIK the object of jang is the person talked to, right? That's how it's used on the list...
Quvar.