tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Oct 28 05:02:54 2002
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
RE: Tao Te Ching; Chp. 43 (lo'laHghach)
- From: "Agnieszka Solska" <[email protected]>
- Subject: RE: Tao Te Ching; Chp. 43 (lo'laHghach)
- Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 11:03:56 +0000
ja' DloraH:
> > vaj vangbe'ghach [C] potlh vISov.
> > ... vangbe'ghach potlh je –
> > Therefore I know the value of non-action.
> > ... the value of non-action –
>
>We do have lo'laHghach "value".
>I'm guessing maybe you didn't want a -ghach -ghach construction.
>potlh can work, tho.
Do we have canon examples of {lo'laHghach}?
'ISqu'
_________________________________________________________________
Get faster connections -- switch to MSN Internet Access!
http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/default.asp