tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri May 31 19:36:46 2002
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: EK: tlhIngan qID
- From: PeHruS9@aol.com
- Subject: Re: EK: tlhIngan qID
- Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 19:36:27 EDT
In a message dated 5/9/2002 8:23:53 AM Mountain Daylight Time,
willm@cstone.net writes:
> QapHa'law' De'wI'wIj. qIDwIj vIqonDI', vIrInpa' tlheghDaq wej *period*
> vIqonqa', ghIq cha' *period* vIqonqa', vaj wa' *period* vIqonqa', vaj
> qIDwIj
> vIrIn. wa' *period* leghlaw'DI' De'wI', mev. not qID rInwI' 'ang De'wI'
> QIp.
I see that charghwI' has used {rIn} transitively, too. (As has Holtej.)
Where did I miss out on the revelation to us that {rin} can take an object or
object-referrent prefixes.
peHruS