tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Jul 03 11:08:51 2002

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: be "something"



Am 02.07.2002 19:58:39, schrieb "Agnieszka Solska" <[email protected]>:

>qen "When you govern, be fair" vImugh. vIghItlh: {bIqumtaHvIS yImay}. 
>jIQaghpu' 'e' vIHarchoH. muj <<yImay>>, lugh <<yImay'eghmoH>>. Do'Ha' 
><<yImay'eghmoH>> vIpar. moHlaw'. ghaytan wej tlhIngan yab Da yabwIj. chaq 
>mu'tlheghwIj vIchoHqu'nIS. chaq naDev Qapbe' "imperative". chaq qaq 
>{bIqumtaHvIS bImaynIS}. vuDraj HIja'!

vIQoyDI', 'ej vIlaDDI', <yImay> vImaS. 'ach mujbej. :-)
When I hear this, and when I read this, I prefer {yImay}. But it's wrong.

tlhIngan yab DanISbej yabmeymaj. 
We just have to think more klingon.

loQ taQ <yImay'eghmoH> 'e' vIHar je.
I also think that <yImay'eghmoH> sounds a little weird.
(But that's the way it is.)

'ach yIqIm: may'eghnISmoHchugh vay', vaj DaH maybe'!
But pay attention: if someone has to become fair, he was not fair before!

chaq qaq <bIqumtaHvIS yImaytaH>
Maybe it's better to say "while you govern, be continously fair"
Or should this then be {bIqumtaHvIS yImay'eghmoHtaH} ???

{bIqumtaHvIS bImaynIS} is still the best way, in my opinion.

Quvar.






Back to archive top level