tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Jan 29 01:27:42 2002
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: I Object!
- From: PeHruS9@aol.com
- Subject: Re: I Object!
- Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 01:27:37 EST
In a message dated 1/28/2002 7:04:21 AM Mountain Standard Time,
SuStel@hotmail.com writes:
> Which to me makes it perfectly clear that that which is considered an
> indirect object in English is typically handled by /-vaD/ in Klingon, NOT
> that Klingons have some terminology that equates with indirect object.
> Call
> it an indirect object now or not; it's just a name for a specific use of
> /-vaD/.
maj. HolQeD tlhach mu'mey law' Hutlh tlhIngan Hol'e' wISovbogh. [chuvmey,
DIp, wot] je DISov. chay' {indirect object} mughlu'? jISovbe' je jIH.
peHruS