tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Jan 29 00:51:17 2002
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: I Object!
From: "Alan Anderson" <[email protected]>
> Similarly, calling a noun marked with the Klingon suffix {-vaD} an
> "indirect object" presents a skewed and incomplete description. The best
> way to describe it, in my opinion, is that the Klingon "beneficiary"
suffix
> fits well to express what in English is called an indirect object. The
> reverse is not necessarily true, as {-vaD} does not *always* map to an
> English indirect object.
What he said! :)
SuStel
Stardate 2078.7