tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Jan 16 21:33:53 2002
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Hech (was: Re: SajwIj)
- From: "Sean Healy" <sangqar@hotmail.com>
- Subject: Re: Hech (was: Re: SajwIj)
- Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 02:33:51 +0000
> > A good point. But then {'e'} itself, as a pronoun, should be
> > interchangeable with any OBJECT.
>
>Right. But the point I wanted to make is that only
>nouns can be OBJECTS in this way. A phrase including
>a plain verb (one without Type 9 suffixes) can never
>be an object of another verb without the referring
>pronouns {'e'/net} in between (except for {neH}).
teH. maj.
>-- ter'eS
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.