tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Jan 16 21:33:53 2002

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: Hech (was: Re: SajwIj)

> > A good point.  But then {'e'} itself, as a pronoun, should be
> > interchangeable with any OBJECT.
>Right.  But the point I wanted to make is that only
>nouns can be OBJECTS in this way.  A phrase including
>a plain verb (one without Type 9 suffixes) can never
>be an object of another verb without the referring
>pronouns {'e'/net} in between (except for {neH}).

teH.  maj.

>-- ter'eS

Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at

Back to archive top level