tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Feb 21 22:19:34 2002

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: qelI'qam

• From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: qelI'qam
• Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 22:19:52 -0500
• References: <[email protected]> <a05100303b89b605092c5@[10.0.1.2]>

From: "Alan Anderson" <[email protected]>
> ja' SuStel:
> >Can someone point me to any place in Okrand's writings where he specifies
> >the length of a /qelI'qam/?  I see a claim of approximately 2 kilometers
in
> >various fan pages on the Internet, but I'd like to know if Okrand agrees
> >with this.
>
> The source of the conversion factor is Star Trek Encyclopedia.  Whether or
> not Marc Okrand agrees, he apparently accommodates it.

And how does he accommodate it?  Do you mean he hasn't contradicted it?

SuStel
Stardate 2144.1

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: qelI'qam
    • From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>

• References:
  • qelI'qam
    • From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>
  • Re: qelI'qam
    • From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: qelI'qam
• Next by Date: Re: mu'mey chu' vItIv
• Prev by thread: Re: qelI'qam
• Next by thread: Re: qelI'qam
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level