tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Aug 16 17:20:52 2002
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: adverbials
>jatlh tulwI'
>> would like to describe the language without using terms like "type
>> four", "type five", but with terms like "noun-phrase-wrapper", which
>> are more plastic, don't you think?
>
>mojaq DaDelmeH mI' Dalo' DaneHbe'chugh,
>'ej pong Dalo' DaneHchugh, *TKD*Daq pong'e'
>lo'bogh *Okrand* Dalo'qang'a'?
>
>mojaq vaghvaD "Syntactic markers" pong *Okrand*.
>pong Dapar'a'?
vIpar'a'? vISuvbe'.
type 5 -> sytactic markers.
qay'be'. latlh mojaqmeyvaD nuq pong chaH? DaH *tkd* vIghajbe'. :(
>(PS: *Subject:*Daq chenbogh *AW:* vIchenHa'moHnIS
>'e' vIqawnIS. pIj vIlIjpu'. vaj ghIHchoH *Subject:*.
>DopDaq qul yIchenmoH, QobDI' ghu'.)
nuqjatlh? sorry.
tulwI',
sts.