tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Apr 15 14:38:35 2002
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
RE: "indefinite subject" and "passive voice"
- From: Angghal@aol.com
- Subject: RE: "indefinite subject" and "passive voice"
- Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 14:27:24 EDT
>Qorwagh ghor Qanqor 'e' vIHar
>I think Krankor broke the window.
>But if my listener did not know that the window was broken, it is a bit
>of a non sequitur.
This leads us nicely into a discussion of the twin pragmatic issues of
Presupposition and Entailment. Every language deals with these problems, both
implicitly and explicitly. Sometimes this is accomplished through lexical
items (e.g., a sentence like "the orphan bought his mother a present" is
serious problems) or through selection restriction rules (e.g., "the lawn
broke the window and blamed Krankor" is not well formed because grass cannot
perform animate or sentient actions). Exceptions exist of course in
figurative language, but that's not what we're talking about here.
The bane of much linguistic examples lies in their presentation without
benefit of context. Jeremy's example above cannot be a "non sequitur" as
presented because there's no sequence being followed. The sentence appears in
isolation, making this a non-problem.
Now, if in the course of discussing the best way to hunt targs or gut Vulcans
a conversant suddenly interuptted with a comment like
Qorwagh ghor Qanqor 'e' vIHar
That would be a non sequitur, and an appropriate response might certainly be
Someone broke a window?