tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sat Apr 13 23:43:26 2002

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: "be'be'" - double negation

At 11:26 2002-04-13 -0400, David Trimboli wrote:
>you can't use your knowledge of human language rules to draw conclusions 
>about Klingon, because Klingon was designed not to be one of them.

Was it?  Because except for its overly uniform syllable structure and 
simple syntax, Klingon looks like a pretty run-of-the-mill American Indian 
language.  It's certainly not shockingly nonhuman like, say, Lojban is.
Sean M. Burke

Back to archive top level