tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sat Apr 13 23:43:26 2002
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: "be'be'" - double negation
At 11:26 2002-04-13 -0400, David Trimboli wrote:
>you can't use your knowledge of human language rules to draw conclusions
>about Klingon, because Klingon was designed not to be one of them.
Was it? Because except for its overly uniform syllable structure and
simple syntax, Klingon looks like a pretty run-of-the-mill American Indian
language. It's certainly not shockingly nonhuman like, say, Lojban is.
--
Sean M. Burke http://www.spinn.net/~sburke/