tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Jan 22 18:58:52 2001
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: yongHa' (was Re: Klingon WOTD: lel (v))
- From: [email protected]
- Subject: Re: yongHa' (was Re: Klingon WOTD: lel (v))
- Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 21:58:35 EST
In a message dated 1/13/2001 3:43:00 PM Central Standard Time,
[email protected] writes:
> Okrand once commented that {jotlhHa'} isn't just "put up"; it's more like
> "put back up (after having taken down)". Because of that, and because of
> the existence of verb {Haw'}, I interpret {yongHa'} as "get back in", i.e.
>
Please analyze {lIt} and {lItHa'} and see if they follow this logic well
enough to back up your theory.
peHrus