tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Aug 20 19:38:56 2001

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: -pu' on second verb

• From: Andrew <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: -pu' on second verb
• Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 19:35:11 -0400 (EDT)

>  DuraS tuq tlhIngan yejquv patlh luDub 'e' reH lunIDtaH DuraS
>   be'nI'pu' lurSa' be'etor je. 

I'm confused. Is it now appropriate to put the adverbial after 'e'? We've
been doing it the other way for so long now, and it always sounded so
elegant. The fact that our canon sources are so disparate is not helping the
situation. I checked on Zrajm's Klingon Akademien, but I couldn't find a
reference for it. Despite the ECP and numerous noble attempts at compiling
all the new words and grammar, where do we stand?

Andrew H. Strader
  Currently on quote hiatus; stay tuned.
  http://www.cis.ohio-state.edu/~strader

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: -pu' on second verb
    • From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Klingon WOTD: toj (v)
• Next by Date: Re: -pu' on second verb
• Prev by thread: Re: -pu' on second verb
• Next by thread: Re: -pu' on second verb
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level