tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sat Nov 18 16:46:02 2000

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: plurals (was Re: Grammar Highlight Each Day)

• From: chris <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: plurals (was Re: Grammar Highlight Each Day)
• Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2000 19:47:07 -0500
• Organization: InfiNet
• References: <[email protected]>

> One is not an irregular form of the other. They are actually different
> nouns.
> 
> The closest English equivalents I can come up with are like "gaggle" 

What about such inherently plural words as scissors? pants? spectacles?

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: plurals (was Re: Grammar Highlight Each Day)
    • From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>

• References:
  • RE: plurals (was Re: Grammar Highlight Each Day)
    • From: "Will Martin" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Klingon WOTD: Huy'Dung (n-body)
• Next by Date: neg particles?
• Prev by thread: RE: plurals (was Re: Grammar Highlight Each Day)
• Next by thread: Re: plurals (was Re: Grammar Highlight Each Day)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level