tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Mar 26 05:19:49 2000
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
RE: KLBC / blue goo from Hell
- From: "David Yeung" <[email protected]>
- Subject: RE: KLBC / blue goo from Hell
- Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2000 08:27:56 -0500
pagh:
><chenmoH> is <chen> plus <-moH>. Unless we specifically know otherwise,
>entries like <chenmoH> and <QeyHa'> in TKD should be treated as stem+suffix
>combinations that are in there for convenience. The one exception that we
>know of is <lo'laH> - "be valuable". So the <-Ha'> goes before the <-moH>.
When you say that /lo'laH/ is an exception, does that
mean that the entire word is the verb and cannot be
broken down?
So, would it be legal to say /lo'laHlaH/, "It can be valuable"?
Also, isn't there a rule that says bare verbs cannot be
/-ghach/ed? If that's the case, /lo'laHghach/ would be
illegal, since /*-laH/ wouldn't be a suffix.
Perhaps I am misinterpreting what you mean when
you say that /lo'laH/ is an exception/. yIQIj!
--
De'vID