tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Jun 21 05:45:39 2000
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: tlhIngan-Hol Digest . . . [was re: Raise Your betleH to the Stars.....]
- From: [email protected]
- Subject: Re: tlhIngan-Hol Digest . . . [was re: Raise Your betleH to the Stars.....]
- Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2000 08:45:20 EDT
jatlhHa' qe'San:
>and (then) proclaim victory for all
>whom have honour"
ja' S.L.:
>This should be "...for all who have honour...".
Qoch qe'San:
>No it shouldn't. Its the same as "....for all that have honour" so the
>whom is quite appropriate as in Klingon they equate to the same suffix.
tlhIngan HollIj buSHa' S.L. DIvI' Hol buS. 'ej lughlaw'.
S.L.:
>"who" is the subject of "have honour". The object of "for" is the whole
>phrase "all who have honour", not just "who" or "all who", and thus the
"who"
>does NOT become "whom".
qe'San:
>for is not a verb it is a suffix "for, intended for" and everyone that
>has honour is who "Victory" is intended for
tlhIngan Hol lo'lu'taHvIS, mojaq 'oHba' <<-vaD>>. 'ach DIvI' Hol
lo'lu'taHvIS, "preposition" 'oH "for." vaj lugh S.L.
DujHoD