tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Jun 16 19:26:02 2000

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

RE: meQpu' Sut QaDmoHwI' / KLBC

• From: Eric Andeen <[email protected]>
• Subject: RE: meQpu' Sut QaDmoHwI' / KLBC
• Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2000 19:25:19 -0700

ja'  ghunchu'wI':
>> 
>> ghuy'cha'!  DaHjaj po meQchoH Sut QaDmoHwI'maj!
>> He'choH, ghIq meQchoH.  SIbI' qul mevwI'pu' rI' be'nalwI'.
>> Do' QaDmoHwI' neH QIH qul.  meQbe' juHmaj.  rIQ pagh.
>> QaDmoHwI' chu' wIpoQ, 'ej He' juH (tlhIch rur), 'ach He'So'.
>>
>> 'ej DaH maghIQchoH.  macheghDI' chaq Seng wISaH.

jangmeH jatlh pIl'o':
> qen  juHlIjDaq  meb  ghaHpu''a'  veqlargh?
> 
> DaSay'choHmoHlI'vIS  Sutrajvo'  
> veqlargh  Sutmey  DachevnISmoH.

jIHaghqu'. veqlargh paSlogh DaSay'moHDI', reH wa' DachIl'a'?

OK - this seems like a perfectly valid way to use <-vIS>. But the rule says
<-vIS> always needs <-taH>. I'll leave the rest up to you. Also, <chev> is
"separate", so you don't need the <-moH>.

pagh

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: meQpu' Sut QaDmoHwI' / KLBC
    • From: Pillow <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: meQpu' Sut QaDmoHwI' / KLBC
• Next by Date: Re: meQpu' Sut QaDmoHwI' / KLBC
• Prev by thread: Re: meQpu' Sut QaDmoHwI'
• Next by thread: Re: meQpu' Sut QaDmoHwI' / KLBC
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level