tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Jul 11 12:16:23 2000

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: yIH? vIghro'? (was -law')

From: Pillow <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: yIH? vIghro'? (was -law')
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2000 11:21:14 -0800
References: <[email protected]>



[email protected] wrote:

> De'vID:
> >>>>nuqjatlh?  yIHmey vIghIjbej.  nIQwIj bIH yIHmey'e'.
>
> pIl'o':
> >>>  ps:    wot  mojaq   poQ'a'  De'vID cha'DIch  mu'tlheghDaq <bIH>?
>
> >> De'vID:
> >> What do you mean?  yIQIj!
>
> pIl'o':
> >I was trying to ask if the <bIH> in your 2nd sentence required a verb
> >suffix.
>
> DaH jIyaj.  QIjpu' *Voragh.
> qatlh wot mojaq poQ /nIQwIj bIH yIHmey'e'/?

> De'vID:
> Why do you think it should have a verb suffix?

I've seen many incidences of using an aspect suffix to a pronoun when it
is used as a "to be" verb.
I thought that <nIQwIj bIH yIHmey'e'.> meant, "The tribbles, they are my
breakfast."
jIyajHa'a'?
                                                            pIl'o'

Follow-Ups:
- aspect suffixes on pronouns (was Re: yIH? vIghro'?)
  - From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>

References:
- Re: yIH? vIghro'? (was -law')
  - From: [email protected]

Prev by Date: Re: Raise Your betleH to the Stars.....
Next by Date: RE: Raise Your betleH to the Stars.....
Prev by thread: Re: yIH? vIghro'? (was -law')
Next by thread: aspect suffixes on pronouns (was Re: yIH? vIghro'?)
Index(es):