tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Jan 12 12:53:14 2000

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: Sargh Quj

• From: TPO <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: Sargh Quj
• Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2000 15:52:14 -0500

>... He Qatlh ghoS; ghIq Hevam lughoSchu' je latlh lIghwI'pu' 'e' lunID.

With our current understanding of ghoS, should this be:
He QatlhDaq ghoS; ghIq HevamDaq ghoSchu' ...

[He Qatlh ghoS] would read "he went TO a difficult path"
[He QatlhDaq ghoS] would read "ON a difficult path, he went", "he was doing
his {going} on a difficult path"


>tlha'laHbe'DI' wa' lIghwI', DIrDajDaq pIqaD "S" ghItlhmeH ghaH pe'
>ghaH.  vaghlogh lujDI', S-a-r-g-h pe'DI', QujtaH 'e' chaw'be' chut.
>(Qu'vatlh!  pIqaD vagh chovnatlhmey lo'laH'a' mu' {Sargh}? chaq loSlogh
>neH lujlaH tlhIngan QujwI'!)

If he was using the written Okrand phonetic system used by humans.


DloraH

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Sargh Quj
    • From: "William H. Martin" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: RE: HolQeD paqwIj
• Next by Date: RE: HolQeD paqwIj
• Prev by thread: Sargh Quj
• Next by thread: Re: Sargh Quj
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level