tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Feb 16 20:04:36 2000

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: KLBC: wa'Hu' qaStaHvISDI' choS, yuQ <Mercury> vIlegh.

• From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: KLBC: wa'Hu' qaStaHvISDI' choS, yuQ <Mercury> vIlegh.
• Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2000 23:06:09 -0500
• In-Reply-To: <61EC550539B6D111932D00A0C92B788C983CF4@ISX>

ja' tuv'el:
>pawpa' wa'Hu' not vIleghpu'...

wa'logh yuQvetlh vIleghta'.  qub wanI', 'ach Dojbe'.  'eb vIwamqa'be'.

***

pagh has answered, but he missed the illegal word-qoq {qaStaHvISDI'}
which you used in the subject line.  {-vIS} and {-DI'} are both type
9 verb suffixes, and cannot appear together.

-- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh

• References:
  • KLBC: wa'Hu' qaStaHvISDI' choS, yuQ <Mercury> vIlegh.
    • From: Burt Clawson <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: <<KLIC>> bomuv boneH'a'? (was RE: Two Rules [KLBC])
• Next by Date: RE: Klingon WOTD: SIv (v)
• Prev by thread: KLBC: wa'Hu' qaStaHvISDI' choS, yuQ <Mercury> vIlegh.
• Next by thread: RE: KLBC: wa'Hu' qaStaHvISDI' choS, yuQ <Mercury> vIlegh.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level