tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Feb 11 20:13:34 2000

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: Canonical Klingon

• From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: Canonical Klingon
• Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2000 23:15:00 -0500
• In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

ja' veS joH:
>so in other words, if there is a word on an email that is not in any of the
>afore mentioned lists, it's either misspelled, or all together an incorrect
>word?  There are no other lists of canonical words ANY WHERE?

law'qu' mu'na' tetlh.  'ach HochvaD lumuchQo' gherwI'.

There are *many* other lists of canonical words.  They're just personal
ones, compiled by individuals for their own use.  Providing a complete
collection of Klingon vocabulary could be seen as infringing copyright,
which is why the New Words List doesn't include all the words published
in the Paramount books.

-- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh

• References:
  • Re: Canonical Klingon
    • From: [email protected]

• Prev by Date: Re: Post Office
• Next by Date: Klingon WOTD: qel (v)
• Prev by thread: Re: Canonical Klingon
• Next by thread: Re: Canonical Klingon
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level