tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Feb 08 20:05:11 2000

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

RE: (KLBC) 'e' as a subject

• From: "TPO" <[email protected]>
• Subject: RE: (KLBC) 'e' as a subject
• Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2000 23:04:29 -0500
• Importance: Normal
• In-Reply-To: <l03020900b4c66321fb8b@[216.206.108.218]>

> HoD Qanqor sees nothing wrong with using a question as the object of
> a sentence.  ...  Many others do
> not share his assessment, and prefer to avoid such constructions.

MO did say that we can not have QAO.
Whether the question words can act the same way english question words do,
is unkown (I don't remember what the terminology is for this).

(Praxis con, May 98)

DloraH

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: RE: (KLBC) 'e' as a subject
    • From: "William H. Martin" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: (KLBC) 'e' as a subject
    • From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Hoch vIper
• Next by Date: Another pun?
• Prev by thread: Re: (KLBC) 'e' as a subject
• Next by thread: Re: RE: (KLBC) 'e' as a subject
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level