tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Sep 10 18:20:19 1999

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: be at a negative angle

• From: Ed <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: be at a negative angle
• Date: Fri, 10 Sep 1999 21:28:48 -0400
• References: <[email protected]>

[email protected] wrote:
> 
> ja' Holtej,
>             'taH' DevaD'e' Danobta' QaH'a' !  pojwI'ghun'e' vIteqmoHpu'
> De'wI'wIjvo'. pojwI' vIlo'nISbejbe'mo', qatlhoblaHbej.     {{{>:o)>
>                                                        trIQ

mu'mey DaghovlaHDI' mughwI' DapoQbe'. 'a, muQaHtaHbej ghunwI'.
vaj seHlaw De' vIchoH Heghta'DI', tI'wI' ru'bej 'oH.

• References:
  • Re: be at a negative angle
    • From: [email protected]

• Prev by Date: Re: jIleng
• Next by Date: mangghom
• Prev by thread: Re: be at a negative angle
• Next by thread: grammar question
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level