tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Nov 02 15:39:27 1999

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: KLBC: Undoubtedly continue to..

• From: [email protected]
• Subject: Re: KLBC: Undoubtedly continue to..
• Date: Tue, 2 Nov 1999 18:38:44 EST

jatlh DloraH:
>because of the ambiguity of neH (want; only) when used with third person, I
>sometimes wish one of the meanings was a suffix, or not be an exception of
>['e'].

What ambiguity are you referring to?

- DujHoD

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: KLBC: Undoubtedly continue to..
    • From: "William H. Martin" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: geez
• Next by Date: Re: geez
• Prev by thread: Re: KLBC: Undoubtedly continue to..
• Next by thread: Re: KLBC: Undoubtedly continue to..
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level