Re: SachtaH Holmaj!

[Christiane.Scharf@t-online.de]

jatlh muHwI':


>Christiane.Scharf@t-online.de schrieb:
>> DaHjaj paqHom (magazine) vIlaD. <<I love you>> jatlhmeH mIwmey qel wa'
nav.
>jIHvaD navvam DangeHlaH'a'? vIlegh vIneHqu'. chaq DalIngqa'laH.

qay'be'. QInvam vIqonta'DI' SoHvaD nav vIngeH.

>
>> loSmaH vagh Holmey pImqu' lutu'lu'. Hol wejDIch 'oH tlhIngan Hol'e'!
>> mu'tlhegh <<qaparHa'>> leghlaH laDwI' (<<qamuSHa'>> vImaS 'ach ghItlhmeH
>> patna' pabbej gherwI'. Do'Ha' qub wanI'vam).
>I prefer something completely else. {qamuSHa'} does not really say
>"love", but literally "I un-hate you" or "I don't hate you", and by the
>way, it's just too long to be klingon. Klingon usually uses more verbs
>than nouns, but in this case I found a sentence with no verb at all :-)
>How do you like {bangwI' SoH}? "You are my loved one."

vIparHa'. I like it. It's one of the rare cases in Klingon where a noun
centered statement doesn't sound clumsy or weak. After all, loving somebody
is rather a state than an action (yes, I know, other people might interpret
it differently...). I believe you can find many different ways to say "I
love you" in any language.

>
>> vulqangan Hol tu'lu' je. mu'tlhegh <<Wani ra yana ro aisha>> cha' nav.
>> vulqangan Holna' 'oH'a' vulqangan Holqoqvetlh'e'?
>jISovbe'. vulqangan Hol vIjatlhbe' 'ach noy Holvetlh je!
>
>Qapla'
>  muHwI'.
>
>


HovqIj