tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Mar 22 12:00:11 1999

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

RE: Using {law'/puS} (was Re: jIqontaH.)



Voragh:
> <ghot> lo' Okrand law' <nuv> lo' Okrand puS 'e' wISov neH.
 
maHvatlh (Zrajm C Akfohg):
: pab'a' mu'tlheghvam? vIyaj 'ach lughlaHbe''a'?  
: <A Q law' B Q puS> vIjatlh TKD (p.70). 
: nuqDaq Datu' mu'tlheghvam chut?
: <O-V-S law' O-V-S puS> 'oH'a', chutlIj?

Voragh:
> You're right.  I'm not sure whether using {law'/puS} like this is kosher,
> but you obviously understood it right away.  I was trying to say: "We only
> know that Okrand uses {ghot} more than (Okrand uses) {nuv}".  

With a little rearrangement, the question becomes moot. <lo'> is also a
noun. 

Okrand <ghot> lo' law' law' Okrand <nuv> lo' law' puS.


pagh
Beginners' Grammarian

tlhIngan Hol Mailing List FAQ
http://www.bigfoot.com/~dspeers/klingon/faq.htm



Back to archive top level