tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Mar 01 00:04:35 1999

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: Dap naQ

• From: [email protected]
• Subject: Re: Dap naQ
• Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 03:04:09 EST

In a message dated 2/26/1999 4:36:01 PM US Mountain Standard Time,
[email protected] writes:

<< been capable of producing had it been used for good and not for evil.
  >>
==============

ngoQ QaQ vIchupta'.  qabqu' mu'ghomvo' mu'mey DItlhapHa'bogh wanI'.  chIch Dap
vIqonpu'.  mIghbe'.  tlhIngan Hol wIghojHa'laH pagh wIghojlaHchu'.

peHruS

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Dap naQ
    • From: "William H. Martin" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Placement of aspect suffixes
• Next by Date: Re: ghunchu'wI'
• Prev by thread: RE: Placement of aspect suffixes
• Next by thread: Re: Dap naQ
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level