tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Jun 30 22:51:36 1999
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: KLBC challenge
- From: Carleton Copeland <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Subject: Re: KLBC challenge
- Date: Thu, 1 Jul 1999 09:52:39 +-400
- Encoding: 13 TEXT
ja' charghwI' 'utlh:
I just thought that since you wanted to explain grammatical rules to me, I
should explain a couple to you.
reH Suvrup SuvwI''a'! I'll *argue* with a /pabpo'/, but never presume to
*explain* grammar (still less to an /'utlh/). *pab qaQIjmoHmeH 'eb pup 'oH
qaDlIj'e'* was supposed to mean: *Your challenge is a perfect opportunity
to get you (I make you) to explain grammar*. Where did I go wrong?