Re: KLBC challenge

[Carleton Copeland <copeland@eycis.com>]

ja' charghwI' 'utlh:

I just thought that since you wanted to explain grammatical rules to me, I 
should explain a couple to you.


reH Suvrup SuvwI''a'!  I'll *argue* with a /pabpo'/, but never presume to 
*explain* grammar (still less to an /'utlh/).  *pab qaQIjmoHmeH 'eb pup 'oH 
qaDlIj'e'* was supposed to mean: *Your challenge is a perfect opportunity 
to get you (I make you) to explain grammar*.  Where did I go wrong?

qa'ral