tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Jun 30 22:51:36 1999

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: KLBC challenge

• From: Carleton Copeland <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: KLBC challenge
• Date: Thu, 1 Jul 1999 09:52:39 +-400
• Encoding: 13 TEXT

ja' charghwI' 'utlh:

I just thought that since you wanted to explain grammatical rules to me, I 
should explain a couple to you.


reH Suvrup SuvwI''a'!  I'll *argue* with a /pabpo'/, but never presume to 
*explain* grammar (still less to an /'utlh/).  *pab qaQIjmoHmeH 'eb pup 'oH 
qaDlIj'e'* was supposed to mean: *Your challenge is a perfect opportunity 
to get you (I make you) to explain grammar*.  Where did I go wrong?

qa'ral

• Prev by Date: Re: KLBC challenge
• Prev by thread: Re: KLBC challenge
• Next by thread: pongqoq chu' vISuqtaH.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level