tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Jun 28 05:26:00 1999
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Love (A-Ha!)
- From: Carleton Copeland <copeland@eycis.com>
- Subject: Re: Love (A-Ha!)
- Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 16:26:30 +-400
- Encoding: 41 TEXT
ja' charghwI':
1) {parHa'} can mean "do badly" if you consider disliking something to be a
goal oriented activity. Given Klingon culture, this is perhaps a valid path
to its meaning. I can only like you if I fail to dislike you. That is a
stronger flavor of liking than merely not disliking you. In other words,
I'd dislike you if I could, but I like you so much, I screw up any effort
at disliking you. See? It is a cultural statement.
2) Learning Klingon without TKD is an impressive challenge. The KLI can
sell you TKD for a sum that most people can save up for who have enough
money to afford Internet access.
3) {QayHa'}? nuqjatlh? I don't understand this word. I'd need context to
figure out what you are doing to the meaning "transfer".
4) I don't yell, "Wrong!" I merely yell, "Not always preferable!"
jIjang:
1) Dajatlhbogh vIparHa'! This sort of cultural statement is exactly what I
was getting at when I wrote (6 weeks ago) that "what intrigues me about
/muSHa'/, /parHa'/, and /tungHa'/ ... is their evocation of a culture in
which it is more "normal" to hate, dislike and discourage than the
reverse." ghunchu'wI' has since argued that all this proves nothing about
Klingon culture. Fair enough. As a scientific venture, reconstructing
Terran culture based on the structure of /DIvI' Hol/ would be dubious at
best. As speculation, it's too much fun to resist.
2) jagh DajeymeH, nIteb yISuvrup! /QeyHa'/ jIja'nISba'pu'.
3) Huch vIghaj. *credit* vIHutlh jay'! juHvengDaq ratlh *check*meywIj.
4) I'm gratified by HoD Qanqor's backing on /musHa'/, but in all fairness,
despite much wrangling over the word, I don't think anyone (least of all
charghwI') has ever yelled, Wrong!
qa'ral