tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Jul 02 23:44:52 1999

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: Qa'Hom qaDHom (KLBC)

• From: Captain Krankor <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: Qa'Hom qaDHom (KLBC)
• Date: Sat, 3 Jul 1999 02:45:02 -0400 (EDT)

> It's possible that this whole argument is at the point of splitting some
> very, very fine hairs.

SuStel, *most* of the arguments here are seem to be about splitting fine, fine
hairs.  Why should this one be any different?  {{;-)  That's why I largely
stay out of them.

		--Krankor

• Prev by Date: Re: jIchegh tulajchugh
• Next by Date: Re: pawlI' ghom naQ
• Prev by thread: Re: Qa'Hom qaDHom (KLBC)
• Next by thread: Re: Qa'Hom qaDHom (KLBC)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level