tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Jan 15 15:45:58 1999

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: -bogh and -wI'

In a message dated 1/15/1999 4:15:48 PM US Mountain Standard Time, writes:

 This is an old fight. I still feel quite confident that in the 
 vast majority of cases, the clearest interpretation is that the 
 suffix {-be'} negates the syllable immediately in front of it. 
 Not the entire sentence up to that point. It is a focussed 
 negative, attaching itself to the single suffix or root verb it 
 directly follows. >>

jIQochbe'qa', charghwI' 'utlh
wot {lo'laH} vIwavqangbe' 'ach wot {ghojmoH} vIwIvqang


Back to archive top level