tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Jan 15 15:45:58 1999
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: -bogh and -wI'
- From: [email protected]
- Subject: Re: -bogh and -wI'
- Date: Fri, 15 Jan 1999 18:40:46 EST
In a message dated 1/15/1999 4:15:48 PM US Mountain Standard Time,
[email protected] writes:
<<
This is an old fight. I still feel quite confident that in the
vast majority of cases, the clearest interpretation is that the
suffix {-be'} negates the syllable immediately in front of it.
Not the entire sentence up to that point. It is a focussed
negative, attaching itself to the single suffix or root verb it
directly follows. >>
jIQochbe'qa', charghwI' 'utlh
wot {lo'laH} vIwavqangbe' 'ach wot {ghojmoH} vIwIvqang
peHruS