tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Feb 22 12:36:02 1999

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: Hoch

peHruS ja' charghwI':
> So far, I've seen two interpretations of Hoch vs. naQ. Yours and 
> everybody else's. Everyone who has spoken up so far has agreed 
> on one, and you alone insist on the other.
> 
I'd like to say that in the case of nIn, I am on peHruS's side.

how can fuel be "whole"? what is bIQ naQ? tI naQ?

I doubt that I would understand these expressions without
further explanation.

                                           Marc Ruehlaender
                                           aka HomDoq
                                           ruehli@iastate.edu

Back to archive top level