In a message dated 2/18/1999 8:46:59 AM US Mountain Standard Time,
aranders@netusa1.net writes:
<< peHruS, what about my description of {nIn naQ} vs {nIn Hoch} do you
not understand or not agree with? I *really* want to help you figure
it out, but if all you say is "no" then I don't know how to continue.
>>
I think you are using Hoch okay. The problem is your definition of naQ.
peHruS