tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Feb 18 21:55:58 1999

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: Hoch

In a message dated 2/18/1999 8:46:59 AM US Mountain Standard Time, writes:

<< peHruS, what about my description of {nIn naQ} vs {nIn Hoch} do you 
 not understand or not agree with?  I *really* want to help you figure
 it out, but if all you say is "no" then I don't know how to continue.
I think you are using Hoch okay.  The problem is your definition of naQ.


Back to archive top level