tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Feb 18 04:35:46 1999

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: TKD



>following TKD page 21:
>Unlike English, however, the lack of a specific suffix 
>for plural does not always indicate that the noun is 
>singular.
>
>so...both translations are correct and one can only know from context if
one is talking about one or more officers. of course it
>would be correct to add a plural suffix to *yaS* to get <yaSpu' vIlegh
jIH> which would then mean <I see the officers> and only
>that.
>
>jIlugh'a'?

HIja'
 
>bIyaj'a'?

HIja', qalugh. jIH mumISmoH chutvetlh!


--- loD Doq



Back to archive top level