Re: ma'veq: It's official

[Alan Anderson <aranders@netusa1.net>]

ja' "Adam Snyder" <asnyder@nycap.rr.com>:
>>: http://www.kingwoodcable.com/kdaq/index.htm
>
>ghay'cha'! pa'Daq vIjaHta'. QaQtaH 'oH 'ach moHaqmey mumISmoH 'e' vIQubpu'.

nuqjatlh?  mumISmoH mu'meylIj'e'.

"$#@%!  I have gone to the room.  It is being good, but prefixes;
I have thought that it confuses me."

Whatever else is wrong with this, there's a rule on TKD page 66 that
tells us that we can't put an aspect (type 6) suffix on the second
verb of a Sentence as Object construction.

-- ghunchu'wI'