tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Feb 16 07:52:43 1999
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: qep'a' pa' qoch vInej
- From: Terrence Donnelly <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: qep'a' pa' qoch vInej
- Date: Tue, 16 Feb 1999 09:51:59 -0600
ghItlh peHruS:
>But, canon from TKD p. 82 indicates that {cha'Hu'} and
>{cha'leS} are one word each, also.
>What evidence do you have from canon that any number used
>with the "nouns" {Hu'} and {leS} should not also be one word each?
>I have seen the number and these two "nouns" written
>separately only by users of this listserv.
Don't we have the phrase /cha'vatlh ben HIq/ from canon somewhere?
-- ter'eS