tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Feb 03 15:00:31 1999

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: Klingon pleasantries



In a message dated 2/3/99 5:32:14 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[email protected] writes:

<< 
 I'm really not liking this particular new rule, as it seems to violate one
 of the primary structures of the language upon which much canon was based.
 Perhaps we should pester Okrand to explain the inconsistency? >>

What exactly is the inconsistency?  qaStaHvIS 'e' vISovbe'.

T'Lod



Back to archive top level