tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Apr 11 14:02:25 1999
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: KLBC: Is third time charm?
- From: [email protected]
- Subject: Re: KLBC: Is third time charm?
- Date: Sun, 11 Apr 1999 17:01:33 EDT
In a message dated 4/9/1999 5:35:33 PM US Mountain Standard Time,
[email protected] writes:
<< cha'logh neH vIleghpu' jIH. This is only the second time I've seen them. I
was working on a reply when this message came. >>
I think this is why we need a better definition of "perfective." By using
{-pu'} you are indicating that you have already seen them twice before this
second time, according to all I can determine by my linguistics courses
regarding "perfective."
peHruS