tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue May 26 12:21:49 1998
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: wanI' Huj
- From: "William H. Martin" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: wanI' Huj
- Date: Tue, 26 May 1998 15:21:47 -0400 (EDT)
- In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> from "d'Armond Speers" at May 26, 98 06:25:08 am
According to d'Armond Speers:
>
>
> povam jISay''eghmoHtaHvIS qaS wanI' Hujqu'. reghchoH ghIchwIj! Hoch
> nguvmoH 'IwwIj. mughIjqu' ghu'vam; not regh ghIchwIj. jIlImbe'. regh 'e'
> vImev 'e' vInID. porghwIj HaHlaw' 'Iwwij. bIQ DoqmoH 'IwwIj. Doqqu'
> qamDu'wIj, ngIbDu'wIj, 'uSDu'wIj je. jIregh 'e' mevDI' jISay''eghnISqa'moH!
>
> --Holtej
Do'Ha'. DuHIvlaw' ghIch SuvwI'pu' machqu'!
bIropbe' 'e' vItul.
charghwI'