tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun May 10 11:54:43 1998
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Another short story... KLBC
- From: "Neal Schermerhorn" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: Another short story... KLBC
- Date: Sun, 10 May 1998 15:00:25 -0400
ghItlh Qov:
>DanaDHa'lu'ta'. batlh DaHutlhchu'.
>This is a complex one, with -lu' and a changed meaning of the prefix.
I would prefer to write <DanaDHa'lu'ta'. quv DaHutlhchu'> to avoid the
synonymous noun/adjective. <batlh DaHutlhchu'> *could* mean "You lack it
honorably."
BUT - is there a MO distinction between <quv> and <batlh> in their nominal
use? I don't recall one, but if I am wrong, this suggestion might be
incorrect.
Qermaq