tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Jun 28 09:44:56 1998
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: cheghqa' muHwI' }}:-)
- From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: cheghqa' muHwI' }}:-)
- Date: Sun, 28 Jun 1998 10:33:21 -0400
From: Quvar muHwI' <[email protected]>
>Saja' - peQoy jay'
jIQoyrup.
>It's summer again, so I am back on the list!!
maj!
>I bet most of you don't know me yet, but you will soon.
>
>Greetings to:
[...]
>SuStel - my first BG, memorizer of Klingon music, the stardate guy, you
>name it... ;-) who guided me into the right way of learning Klingon.
[...]
quv chonobpu'bogh Dun law' Hoch Dun puS!
(Now then . . . can we use the "prefix trick" here? If we can, doesn't that
imply that we can use it without the trick, using {-vaD}? If so, doesn't
that prove that we can modify relative clauses with Type 5 nouns, something
which has never been forbidden, but which seems awfully murky?)
DaH tlhIngan Hol yIjatlhchoH!
SuStel
Stardate 98490.4