tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Jun 15 19:53:53 1998
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: cha'leS jIghIQchoH.
- From: "William H. Martin" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: cha'leS jIghIQchoH.
- Date: Mon, 15 Jun 1998 22:55:59 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time)
- In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
- Priority: NORMAL
On Mon, 15 Jun 1998 18:59:55 -0700 (PDT) TPO
<[email protected]> wrote:
> >cha'leS jIghIQchoH. cha'maH wejleS jIchegh. jISeyqu'. Qatlh
> >loSmeH Qu'wIj. DaH jIjaH vIneH! 'ach jIlengrupbe'.
> >lengmeH DochmeywIj vIghomnISchu'.
>
> In this last sentance I would have used a [-moH].
>
> .. DochmeywIj vIghomnISmoH
Good point. While Okrand has used {ghom} transitively without
{-moH}, I'm not really saying that I'm meeting my things. I'm
saying that I'm gathering my things, which is causing them to be
together. Thanks.
> Hmmm, this would sound better as vIghommoHnIS but of course we must use
> proper suffix order.
It would not sound better to MY ear. But then some people think
lowercase "i"s would look better...
> DloraH
charghwI'